LET FOOD BE THY MEDICINE, AND MEDICINE BE THY FOOD. HIPPOCRATES, The Father of Medicine
PureSanté
  • Home
    • VIDEOS
  • SERVICES
    • Consultations >
      • First Appointment
      • Follow Up Appointment
      • Distance Consultations
    • Other Services
  • Resources
    • Printables
    • Products >
      • Vitamins
      • Minerals
      • Multivitamins
      • Fatty Acids
      • Digestive Support
      • Detox and Cleansing
      • Food Supplements
      • Personal Products
      • Condition Specific Formulas
    • Health Categories
    • Infographics
    • RECIPES
    • RECOMMENDED BOOKS
    • RECOMMENDED DIETS
    • QUICK MEAL IDEAS
    • TOP HEALTH TIPS
    • Website Links
  • About
  • Contact
  • Testimonials

Dispelling the Fears about Tetanus

11/5/2012

18 Comments

 
I've just been doing a ton of research about Tetanus, its prevalence and the tetanus vaccine. I was led to this because of a discussion we had with our pediatrician. She was very adamant that we get our child vaccinated against Tetanus as soon as possible because we would be practically living on a building site from the time she was little and she proceeded to try and instill some crazy fear in me of any kind of sharp object.  So I decided I had better read up on the issue as much as possible so that I would be well informed of the truth and misinformation that surrounds Tetanus and its vaccination.

After doing all the research on it, I have to say I was rather amazed at how much fear we are able to develop around an issue like Tetanus wihout the majority of the population even knowing anything about it.  It is obvious that most people are just repeating what they have been told by doctors and the medical profession as a whole. Tetanus is not nearly as prevalent as we are lead to believe, nor is it the absolute killer if we did so happen to contract it. From research I was doing, the fatality rate is only 18% of cases, which means that another 82% of people who contract tetanus will be just fine!

Also, the  majority of cases occur as a result of poor nutritional/health status and bad hygiene...a bad combination for many other diseases that normally healthy people do not contract either. This continues to confirm my understanding that the most important thing is to maintain overall health - and that that is a better guarantee of being able to avoid or recover from most illnesses than any kind of vaccination against something you may one day come into contact with. And in the case of tetanus little do most people know that Tetanus is all around us in the soil...the chances of getting tetanus are so high it’s a wonder we aren't all dead...oh yeah...we have immune systems that protect us.

Also from the research, it has been proven that vaccination does not even prevent tetanus in many cases, as there have been many cases of tetanus even in vaccinated people.

So food for thought...next time someone tries to convince you that Tetanus is this huge and dangerous killer that is lurking in the mud just waiting to kill you the next time you get cut, share with them some of the statistics and real research about tetanus which I am sure they did not know, and you may even have succeeded in helping them deal with their unfounded fears in the process! Which is always a plus - ignorance produces fear, but understanding and truth brings freedom. :-)  



A COMPLETE PDF BOOKLET OF THIS ENTIRE ARTICLE CAN BE DOWNLOADED DIRECTLY BY CLICKING HERE> DOWNLOAD TETANUS BOOKLET - PDF
----------



Tetanus 

An Informed Approach 

By Jason Saunders 

In the USA, with an average of seven to 10 deaths a year from Tetanus, there is a 180-260 times greater chance of dying from Tuberculosis. 


Here's a story thats familiar to most of us. A few years ago my father nipped off the tip of his thumb with his secateurs while gardening. I drove the traumatised victim to the after-hours doctors surgery where they bandaged his thumb and gave him a tetanus shot, just in case. The theory is that dirt commonly has tetanus bacterial spores in it (Clostridium tetani), which might have entered and remained in the wound. 

Tetanus vaccine is used prophylactically in case the spores start replicating and producing tetanus' sometimes deadly toxin. This toxin can get into the bloodstream and then the central nervous system, producing rigidity in the muscles, painful spasms, back arching and, most usually as the earliest symptom, the painful clamping shut of the jaws (hence tetanus old common name, lockjaw). The spores do not cause the disease; the toxin does. The vaccine is designed to elicit an antibody response to the toxin, not to the spores themselves. My father did not get tetanus. 

It is a pretty rare disease these days. Most people, it is probably fair to say, believe that this is because in the generations following the late 1950s we were given tetanus shots as infants, subsequent 10-yearly boosters and, as with my father, routine vaccination following injuries. However, there are some reasons why we might doubt that simple explanation. 

  
First, tetanus is a very rare disease in countries such as Australia, New Zealand and the United States, even though a large proportion of these populations are unvaccinated or under-vaccinated. Tetanus was also a relatively rare disease in the pre-vaccine era (that is, before the 1950s) when everyone was unvaccinated. Secondly, statistics show it is an age-related condition. It is mainly elderly people who have died from tetanus. 

Anecdotal evidence suggests that poor nutrition and lifestyle habits that impinge on the immune system, such as smoking and drinking heavily, are also connected to susceptibility, usually in tandem with the age factor. Thirdly, wound care techniques have steadily improved since the 19th century when deaths from tetanus were more common. While the general public is largely unaware of this aspect, conventional medical literature gives as much, if not more, importance to this development as it does to vaccination. 

How Rare Is Tetanus?

Very. For example, in the United States, with its population of 280 million people according to the 2000 Census, only 33 cases of tetanus were recorded in 1999. In 1988 there were 53 cases (with 10 deaths) and from 1990 to 1995 the average number of cases per year was 49.6 Most of the cases occurred in people aged over 50. It could be argued that people in their senior years are often unvaccinated and therefore vulnerable, since universal tetanus vaccination only began in the United States in 1956. 

However, why isn’t the huge reservoir of younger adults who are lacking tetanus antibody being represented in these statistics? According to Center for Disease Control (CDC) tetanus vaccine experts, The 1988 to 1991 serosurvey indicated that 20 per cent of children 10 to 16 years of age did not have a protective level of antibody. A 1979 study found that in a sample of 1900 adults over 20 years of age, only 386 per cent were fully immunised. If we extrapolate from that study alone, about 120 million or so citizens (60 per cent of 200 million) were unprotected yet virtually none of them was getting tetanus, let alone dying from it. 

Walene James, in her book Immunization: the Reality Behind the Myth, points out that in the United States in 1990 there were 25,700 cases of tuberculosis with 1800 deaths, tuberculosis therefore immensely outweighing tetanus as a cause of death. (Mothers of unvaccinated children who might be worried about them contracting tetanus because they’ve just joined the pony club, take note!) 

In the United States, with an average of seven to 10 deaths per year from tetanus, there is a 180 to 260-times greater chance of dying from tuberculosis. In fact, since lightning strikes about 1800 people a year in that country, with an approximate mortality rate of 25 per cent (450 deaths), there is a 45- times greater chance of being killed by lightning than tetanus! 

Australian vaccine researcher Dr Viera Schreibner estimates that there are only 12 cases of tetanus, on average, per year in Australia, about half of them occurring in fully vaccinated people. 

In New Zealand the official statistics for the 13-year period between 1980 and 1992 revealed 86 cases of tetanus. Seventy-nine per cent of the cases were in people aged 40 years or over; of the eight fatalities, seven people were aged over 70 and the other was 58 years old. As vaccine researcher Hilary Butler points out, most of those older people were probably unvaccinated, as mass tetanus vaccination only began in New Zealand in 1960. 

Butler also poses a very good question: why didn’t these unvaccinated people get tetanus when they were children? 

New Zealand was a very rural society in the first half of the 20th century and children were more apt to play outdoors than they are today. Living on farms where animal manure was around, there would have been every chance for tetanus bacilli to enter the small wounds and abrasions they sustained. Mind you, its misleading to think that tetanus spores are primarily found in rural areas. 

Investigations have revealed that tetanus spores are present everywhere: on our clothing, in house dust, on urban streets and apparently even in the human gut. One survey detected tetanus bacilli in 10 out of 35 human faeces samples! Louis Smith, PhD, suggests that C. tetani should be considered as being present at all times, even in the secluded atmosphere of an operating room in a large, modern hospital. He also says the idea that horse manure is especially high in tetanus is an old and faulty fable. What about Wounds? 

Why weren’t all these unvaccinated children growing up in the first half of the 20th century being struck with tetanus?
Tetanus spores are everywhere and while the experts agree that traumatic wounds such as those that occur during wars are more likely to lead to tetanus, they acknowledge that tiny wounds can too. 

According to George Dick, Professor of Pathology at London University, Forty or 50 per cent of tetanus results from wounds which are so trivial that medical attention has not been sought. In as many as one-third of the cases, there has been no detectable wound. So a slight scratch or even an insect bite can lead to tetanus, but not for unvaccinated children, nor even most unvaccinated adults. 

Compared with adults, children have an amazing vitality, and its probably this that protected unvaccinated children from tetanus all those years ago and allowed them to develop natural immunity. Its highly probable that only people with very depleted vitality and very weak immune systems, such as the elderly, are susceptible to getting tetanus from non-traumatic wounds. The rest of us, whether unvaccinated or not, have a natural resistance to it even, I believe, when we experience traumatic wounds. 

According to A. Trevor Willis, DSc,MD, PhD, Simple contamination of wounds with pathogenic Clostridia is not uncommon, and many such wounds heal by first intention without special treatment and without sequelae. In the pre-vaccine era, even wartime wounds with deeply embedded shrapnel and bullets, which provided the ideal anaerobic environment for the bacilli to start replicating, seldom developed tetanus. The bacilli, says Louis Smith, was isolated from 19 per cent of World War I wounds expressly examined for it. 

These patients had not been immunised against tetanus, yet the disease developed in somewhat less than one per cent of the wounded who did not receive prophylactic antitoxin. To illustrate further, of 520,000 American soldiers wounded in World War I, only 70 developed tetanus. 


Vitamin C And Immunity 

The small minority of people who develop tetanus from trivial wounds are and the statistics are suggestive likely to be immune deficient, either because of old age, chronic ill- health, poor diet or drug taking (I include smoking and heavy drinking in this category) and most likely a combination of these factors. Many elderly people, as a result of poor appetite, have a diet lacking in essential vitamins and minerals. The same goes for intravenous drug users, another group prone to tetanus. 

Linus Pauling, double Nobel Laureate scientist and expert on vitamin C, believed sub-clinical scurvy from vitamin C deficiency was widespread amongst senior citizens, making them prone to many illnesses. Vitamin C is a nutrient that is critical for immunity, so it should perhaps come as no surprise to learn it can be specifically curative. 

Doctor Fred Klenner, a North Carolina physician, outlined in various papers published from 1948 to 1974 his success with using intravenous mega-doses of ascorbate to deactivate tetanus spores and their toxin. This makes sense, because vitamin C removes toxins from the bloodstream while also enhancing white blood cell activity. 

In addition, since vitamin C is vital to collagen formation and has been proven to speed wound healing time, it is possible it also helps the body isolate and contain tetanus at the wound site. (Wounds can apparently break down if the body lacks vitamin C in the tissues.) Perhaps this is one reason why smokers may be a little more prone to tetanus, since they are known to have less vitamin C in the body. 

Vaccine researcher Hillary Butler says she has personally known only two people who contracted tetanus and both were middle-aged people who drank and smoked heavily and had poor diets. 

Its all about what strengthens or weakens the immune system. Even Louis Pasteur, the father of the microbe theory of disease, came to agree. 

He is reputed to have made a retraction on his deathbed by declaring that his great scientific rival, Claude Bernard, had been right after all, that the microbe is nothing, the soil is everything. 

By soil Bernard meant the living force of the body and its variable conditions which are influenced by emotions, diet, stress, age et cetera. Essentially he was speaking of susceptibility, of an inbuilt vital resistance, of something much more than just the antibody-antigen theory of immunity and the bio-mechanical model which fathered it (though that is part of it), of a force that could subjugate any microbial foe if its vitality was high enough. 

The trouble with orthodox medicine is that it doesnt give enough recognition to all the variable factors that influence vitality, mainly because it doesnt recognise vitality as a valid concept in the first place. So it focuses on narrow measurable criteria for immunity, tending to support the outcomes of profitable techno-centric interventions like vaccines over more holistic solutions like nutrition. 

The Holistic viewpoint would not find it a strange idea that people with no antibody to tetanus could still have good protection and thats even without taking into account their lack of representation in tetanus statistics.Tetanus vaccination makes the body unsusceptible to the disease by inducing production of neutralising antibody (or antitoxin) to the tetanus toxin; this is the result of introducing weakened toxin into the body (the vaccine contains no attenuated bacilli). 

Therefore, it seems ludicrous to suppose sub-clinical (non-disease manifesting) contact with the bacilli such as we all must be experiencing regularly cant do the same. Indeed, the comprehensive and authoritative Vaccines edited by S.A. Plotkin and W.A. Orenstein alludes to this: Studies in the developing world and some developed nations ... have shown substantial proportions of some reportedly unimmunised populations ... [to have] detectable levels of antitoxin. 

Specifically, up to 80 per cent of people in India and up to 95 per cent of people in a group of Ethiopian refugees had levels of antitoxin [considered protective]. However, these pro-vaccine establishment authors dismissed the findings by concluding, Even if natural immunity occurs in some unimmunised populations, it has no substantial importance in the control of tetanus. 

Personally, I think the facts speak for themselves: the unvaccinated populations of the Third World are not decimated by tetanus; natural immunity can be the only explanation for this. Similarly, in 19th century England, although tetanus incidence and mortality was significantly higher than it is today, it never came close to being a widespread cause of death. 

Thomsons 1882 Dictionary of Domestic Medicine and Surgery of tetanus, we can look at how the mortality rate plummeted during the early 20th century before tetanus vaccination became widespread. In the United States, the death rate was 64 per 100,000 of the population in 1900, eight per 100,000 in 1940 and 4.5 per 100,000 in 1950. 

What were the reasons? 

There were probably many. For one, this period was a time of rapid improvement in social conditions. Among other things, wages rose, diets improved, slums were cleared, running water was installed in homes and safety measures in workplaces were legislated. It was a time when mortality from all infectious diseases decreased greatly, and better living conditions were undoubtedly the catalyst. 

In the case of tetanus, while better general health as a result of social change has to be a factor in the declining mortality rate, the most important reason was that wound care techniques and sterilisation procedures greatly advanced in this period. 

It meant fewer women contracted tetanus after giving birth, less suggests the disease was comparatively rare. This was despite many members of the English working class being undernourished and lacking essential vitamins and minerals as a result of poverty; despite people living much more physical lives and hence being injured much more often; and despite surgical techniques being fairly rudimentary, with sterilisation almost unknown. If the pro-vaccine argument is right, people in the 19th century should have been dropping like flies from tetanus, but they werent. 

As further proof of the doubtful role vaccination had to play in the control people contracted it from surgery and far fewer babies contracted it when the umbilical cord was cut. According to Plotkin and Orenstein, in the United States there were 90 per cent less tetanus deaths occurring in babies in 1930 than in 1900. 

Today, the World Heath Organization estimates that 400,000 babies in the Third World die each year of tetanus because of the use of unsterile cutting instruments and poor neonatal care while the umbilical stump heals. 

Just A Booster! 

It is clear, then, that tetanus vaccination cannot take most of the credit for saving us from tetanus. We mostly didnt need saving in the first place, and in those cases where we did, other procedures deserve credit. Moreover, the giving of tetanus shots to children and babies two groups in absolutely no danger from tetanus as borne out by the statistics is a blind routine. 

So is the practice of giving shots to people after they have been injured. Tetanus symptoms commence within a few days of the injury up to three weeks later, but usually within about seven days. It has generally been observed that the sooner the symptoms come on, the worse the prognosis. Since antibodies take about 14 days to form after vaccination, they could have no effect in preventing a dangerous case of tetanus. 

According to pro-vaccine tetanus expert A. Trevor Willis, Tetanus toxoid (vaccine) injected for the first time into a non-immune individual at risk from tetanus provides no protection against the risk at this time."" So why is it offered so routinely after injury? If you pinned them down, the authorities would be forced to admit its a policy designed to keep everyone up to date and an expedient time to give a booster shot. They probably dont mind the popular misconception that the vaccine is a prophylactic for immediate injury. After all, vaccination is an industry that has always thrived on uninformed fear. The side effects of vaccination are another story, but I think its clear my father neednt have worried about getting the shot. 

References 

1. M.F. Para et al.
2. S.A. Plotkin and W.A. Orenstein, eds. Vaccines, 462.
3. J.P. Mullooly, Tetanus immunization of adult members of an HMO, American Journal of Public Health 74, no. 8 (August 1984): 841-842.
4. New Zealand Ministry of Health, Immunisation Handbook 1996.
5. Lowbury and Lilly (1958).
6. Louis Smith, The Pathogenic Anaerobic Bacteria, 180.
7. George Dick, Immunization, 26.
8. A. Trevor Willis, Anaerobic Bacteriology, 275.
9. Smith, 180.
10. Plotkin and Orenstein.
11. Ibid, 447.
12. New England Medical Journal 280, no. 11: 570.
13. Plotkin and Orenstein, 449.
14. Willis, 302. 

18 Comments
Nick J.
9/7/2016 02:10:37 pm

"From research I was doing, the fatality rate is only 18% of cases, which means that another 82% of people who contract tetanus will be just fine! Also, the majority of cases occur as a result of poor nutritional/health status and bad hygiene".

These statements are ludicrous:

1. Nearly 1/5 of the people who contract it die, something that is preventable. Would you take your chance?
2. The 82% that you state are clearly due to several factors, granted sure they maybe of reasonable health, but modern medical science has alot to do with this. A few factors, like seeking medical attention promptly, administration of TT, proper cleansing/debridement of the wound as well as prophylactic antibiotic is likely the contributory factor for this.
Now, you might argue, that's BS. But, look at the case fatalities that were reported BEFORE these measures were implemented. 82% of the people will not have survived.

I would recommend instead of poorly extrapolating numbers on your website, to consider getting educated in epidemiology and public health.

Reply
Nina Hendricks
30/9/2016 09:02:14 pm

The tetanus survivors who spent months in the ICU with such strong muscle spasms that they shattered vertebrae are "just fine" in your mind because they serve your purpose as a statistic just because their infections were controlled well enough that they Didn't die. There is no harm in a tetanus shot, why would you risk it! And we are not infected all the time because it is an anaerobic spore, it needs special conditions to grow in the body. (Deep tissue wounds).

Reply
Laci
14/10/2016 07:08:36 am

Do you realize in 2014 alone, the vaccine actually killed at least 74 people? There are dangers to vaccines.

Reply
Bart
8/5/2017 01:55:38 am

Do you have a reference for this statistic? I'd find it v useful for my investigations if you can please share.

Robert
9/6/2018 02:12:31 pm

I would like to read the autopsy reports on these people. Could you please provide the reference. Thanks

Laci
14/10/2016 07:09:02 am

That's just in the US.

Reply
Ernie
14/8/2017 05:03:09 am

Laci- where do you get that information? You are obviously either a troll or a complete ignoramus.

Reply
Josh
17/1/2017 03:48:48 am

This is a terrible website and humanity would be better off if the writers all died.

Reply
Sarah Hartley
28/2/2017 09:05:45 am

Wow! Shocking how a person is treated if they read about your different veiw point then theirs!!! The last responder wished you would die!!! That's crazy.! Thank you for your research. I learned a lot. I've been researching this as well because of our visit to the pediatrician. I'll keep searching. The CDC is very helpful.

Reply
Ernie
14/8/2017 05:07:26 am

Sarah- while I don't use or condone the language, nor do I wish anyone would die, what Josh stated is technically true- humanity would be better off if these people did not post such obviously erroneous and unsafe content on the internet. Being dead would, obviously be one way that they would stop posting this type of misinformation. Getting educated, is preferible in my opinion though.

The problem is that many people who read this type of information actually believe it, and make poor choices as a result, choices that put them, their children and even others in the community at great risk.

Reply
Bob
27/9/2017 08:04:51 am

I really don't understand how people who are in favor of dismissing this type of article, are so unwilling to dig into even the simplest study on the subject. The medical system in America (and else ware at times) in the past have put forth some of the most ridiculous forms of treatment and preventative care, that was horrifically bad for their patients and society at large. Some examples include, using x-ray to see babies in the womb before ultra sound. Recommending a cigarette a day. Recommending we eat refined white flower as the main staple of our diet. Telling us that hydrogenated oils were healthy. Not to mention the first gen vaccines and prophylactics that reeked havoc until they figured out that mercury was bad (keeping in mind they still have Thimerisol in some of them). And the list goes on and on. Why would I believe or trust at face value what the CDC or the EPA say when they openly contradict each other on their websites about certain allowable limits of particular chemicals. Its a multi billion dollar industry and I am supposed to believe that there is no decision making that are influenced by profit. If I should scrutinize my local HVAC tech and mechanic to verify the veracity of their claims, then why not my doctor and the giant corporation that literally has billions of dollars on the line if its realized that some of these vaccines are maybe not necessary. I am definitely not anti vac nor am I paranoid. I don't believe that doctors are intentionally lying. But next time you are in front of a doctor (specifically MD) ask them how much time they studied nutrition in all their years of schooling. or where they got their info for vaccines. Was it from a third party or from a pharmaceutical rep. Or the CDC who holds patents on vaccines and employs ex CEOs of the vaccine companies. Keeping in mind that the pharmaceutical industry has more lobbyists in Washington that any other industry period. Including oil. Not exactly unbiased in my opinion. One area of study might be interesting for those that disregard with this article. How much the American medical system is in contradiction to the rest of the developed worlds medical systems. Its not always the case but Its shocking how much they disagree. Just some food for thought. And for those that like to sound smart by saying "what are your references".. Go do your own study, I spent 6 years and have continued to dig since then. Its a lot easier to find, if you don't go into it with a bias stopping at web MD and the CDC. The best way I have found, is to try to prove yourself wrong and then do it again once you have.

Mark Rapko
8/6/2017 03:38:31 pm

Jump from bed of truck foot landed on board with a30 year old rusty nail poking up went through foot completely 2 days ago cant walk foot swollen twice size of other foot.Anything for me to worry about?

Reply
Emily
18/1/2018 05:52:12 pm

Thank you Bob. I completely agree with much of what you've stated.
In addition yo your comments, I think it's important that the american people are aware of the fact that there is no neutral, oversight committee or agency in place currently that ensures that all vaccine research studies are conducted in accordance to strict policies, procedures, and ethical standards.

In fact, it's often the responsibility of the manufacturing company of a new vaccine, to conduct safety and efficacy studies demonstrating that their new vaccine is safe and works. The potential be conflicts of interests and deception or fabrication of findings that can occur when we let the company who makes a product be in charge of testing that product and letting us know it's safe, is asinine beyond belief. But this is exactly how our current system functions. But it gets worse..compile that knowledge with the fact that vaccine manufacturers we're granted legal immunity and no liability for any harm or deaths incurred from their vaccines, and you basically establish asyatem in which there is ZERO motivation for vaccine makers to make vaccines that are as safe as possible, and tested to ensure that they produce the position effects and attributed success of lasting immunity.

Which again, has never been experimentally demonstrated by double blind, scientific studies. Vavvine success is operationally defined by whether or not a vaccine generates antibody production in receipients. That's all they have to do. Except that antibody production has never been studied to support the.claims that antibodies equate to immunity, or reduction in illness. Never once has this been experimentally supported.
Yet,this is the entire premise for Vaccinating. But it's never been studied or tested or questioned.

All we have are epidemiological studies, that use data and statistics over time, which we then incorrectly attribute to vaccines..while.compleyely ignoring confounding variables, improvements in environmental influences, like Indoor plumbing, better nutrition, clean water etc or other extraneous variables which may contribute to declines in disease morbidity and mortality rates. We let correlation serve as causation for attributed vaccine success, and refuse to demonstrate these beliefs by vital.scientific experimental research studies. And I haven't even mentioned the multitude of issues with vaccine safety studies, which are just as alarming and inadequate.we have no vaccine safety studies demonstrating the safety of entire cdc schedule, or whether receiving multiple vaccines at once is safe.we also have no longitudinal studies, or studies lasting longer than a couple weeks to months at best.


Anyone considering vaccines should thoroughly research and educate themselves on the science, or lack there of, on vaccines and determine whether or not the believed benefits are worth the potential risks.

It's incredulous to me how ignorant most people are about vaccines and the scientific inquiry involved in justification for them.
There is NO other pharmacuetical product or treatment that is not required to be extensively studied through experimental studies to support that the intervention elicits the promised effect and does so without serious adverse health effects.


Any of you naysayers doubting anything I've said, I implore you to try and prove me wrong... But be prepared to be shocked and horrified when you realize I'm speaking complete truth.

Reply
John Edo
26/4/2018 04:57:03 pm

Wow. Terrific display of shocking ignorance. The reason there are few fatalities is the fact that there is a high compliance rate of vaccination. Conspiracy theories regarding vaccinations are popular, and unfortunately all wrong. Believe what you want, but get your kids vaccinated. When they’re 18 they can decide to tempt death in whatever ways they prefer. Just ask the parents of kids that died after not being vaccinated how they feel, whether it was worth it to murder their children by preventing them from receiving adequate medical care.

Reply
Lindsay
10/5/2018 04:04:06 pm

Curious if you have documented evidence of this occurring in the US? (Child dying due to not being vaccinated) It seems I see many stories of suspected vaccine injuries and never the other way around. I also believe that the National Vaccination Injury Compensation program hands out quite a bit of money every year but somehow manages to skirt any fault or responsibility. Very interesting that you are so quick to hold parents accountable for murder when they don't vaccinate their children. Do you stand in line at McDonalds and accuse parents of murder as well??? Arguably there are far more deaths being caused by poor diet and disgusting chemicals in fast food. Just a thought.... perhaps you should step down off your righteous horse now!?!?

Reply
Jackson
12/5/2019 10:03:58 am

Thanks for the article. Basically everyone needs to do their own research when making important life decisions. I personally am pro vaccine. Maybe because I have never had negative reactions or know anyone who has. But that is just my experience. The current outbreak of measles does seem to be related to non vaccination though. Anyway, I do thank you for answering one of my major questions about how long it takes the tetanus vaccine to take effect. I searched for hours trying to answer that question. You quoted an expert who states it takes 14 days. That really does make me question why a doctor gives you a tetanus shot a day after an injury and send you on your way like you will be protected no matter when your last booster was. Of course there is also a TIG injection that is immediately active but only lasts a short time. Oh well, hopefully that fresh puncture wound on my foot will be OK, I did go get a tetanus shot, but 14 days is longer than I thought it would take to engage.

Reply
Slowpoke
11/5/2020 11:02:34 am

I truly appreciate this article. With the current CCP Virus circulating around the world this information is quite valuable.
Anyone who listens to Bill Gates and feels he is your friend you are mistaken. He wants at least half of the worlds population to vanish. He is proposing to accomplish this goal by making everyone in the world get vaccinated for CCP Virus. His vaccine will mostly be garbage and only a fool would take it. Here’s some research you can check.
Not once in any news story or news conference have any of these officials from CDC, WHO, NIH, Canada Health, The White House, CCP or anybody that is being given legitimacy in the Main Stream News has recommended taking Vitamins D3 and C and Zinc, Oregano Oil, Iodine and other immune boosting supplements. Instead of lockdown and social distancing, we were all required to take a good vitamin regime then there would be very little to be concerned about. Get lots of sunshine and exercise and take the vitamins, don’t have sex with people that you don’t know where they have been and you won’t get sick. Love God through Jesus.

Reply
Jo K.
23/5/2020 11:21:06 pm

Interesting thread.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Infections & Parasites

    All
    Bacterial Dysbiosis
    Candida Albicans
    Lymes Disease
    Parasites
    Tetanus

    RSS Feed

© 2019 Rachael van der Gugten 
Liability Disclaimer: The information on this website is not intended to replace qualified medical advice. It is not intended to diagnose treat or cure any illnesses but is used for the dissemination of valuable information about health related topics that may be interesting to the general public. Any information or advice you may incorporate into your life as a result of reading information on this website is your full responsibility. PureSanté and Rachael van der Gugten are not liable for any actions you choose to take. All articles written by Rachael van der Gugten should only be reproduced upon permission. Speak to your qualified healthcare specialist about any changes to your healthcare regime that you implement.